Posted by Chester Morton / Monday 19 December 2016 / No comments
The factors that prevent Sierra Leone from fully practicing the Rule of Law
Definition of rule of Law
Rule of law has two definitions, the classical meaning as
proposed by A. V. Dicey and the modern definition by the New Delhi declaration
in 1959 at a meeting of the International Commission of Jurists.
According to A. V. Dicey, in his classical opinion, Rule of
Law means the law is supreme. In other words, the law is the highest authority
of the land in the absence of which nothing else can prevail. For example, the
law does not reside in the bosom of anybody.
The contemporary definition, as developed by the
International Commission of Jurists states that it is the conditions,
structures, institutions, processes and procedures that must exist so that the
individual can enjoy his life in dignity, security and prosperity.
LIMITATIONS OF LAW IN
SIERRA LEONE
Immunity before the law
Another factor that limits the full realization of Rule of
Law is the immunity against prosecution which some categories of citizens
enjoy. Diplomats who fall foul of the law in their host country are exempt from
trial in the host country. Parliamentarians also enjoy immunity from
prosecution for acts performed in the course carrying out their legitimate
duties. They not also be arrest to or from parliament.
Delays in court
In Sierra Leone, there are too may delays in court. One case
can take several years before it can be dealt with. Some litigants would rather
let matters be than to battle it in the law courts. This is an affront to the
practice of Rule of Law. Such delays limit the full realization of rule of Law.
Level of poverty
The general level of poverty in the Sierra Leone is so
widespread that issues of bread and butter are of more importance to the people
than the pursuit of fundamental human rights in the courts of law. Besides, if
they want to fight for their rights, they may not have the necessary resources
to pay the legal services that it might entail.
Absence of Legal Aid
The modern definition of Rule of Law indicates that the
individual must have access to legal advice. Where he cannot pay for his
services avenues must be created for the realization of that goal. However, the
level of legal aid in the Sierra Leone is not adequate enough to carter for the
mass of the people. Therefore, they are left without being attended to. Under
such a situation, Rule of Law cannot be said to be properly functioning.
The level of illiteracy of citizens
One of the factors that prevent the full realization of the
practice of Rule of Law is the high level of illiteracy of the citizens,
especially in the developing world. For some citizens, Rule of Law could as
well be an animal living in the forest, they just do not care. Such people do
not see the reason why they should care about whether the government stays
within the confines of the law or not.
Absence of an independence judiciary
The absence of absolute judicial independence in Sierra Leone
prevents the full implementation of the Rule of Law. The politicians interfere unnecessarily
in the work of the judiciary to the extent that some members of the judiciary
do not have the necessary freedom they need to work.
SAMPLE QUESTIONS
1. Explain five factors that militate against the full
implementation of Rule of Law in Your country.
2. What five factors prevent the full realization of Rule of
Law in the Sierra Leone?
